Evaluation of an Online Training Program on COVID-19 for Health Workers in Papua New Guinea.

BACKGROUND: Health worker training is an important component of a holistic outbreak response, and travel restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the potential of virtual training. Evaluation of training activities is essential for understanding the effectiveness of a training program on knowledge and clinical practice. We conducted an evaluation of the online COVID-19 Healthcare E-Learning Platform (CoHELP) in Papua New Guinea (PNG) to assess its effectiveness, measure engagement and completion rates, and determine barriers and enablers to implementation, in order to inform policy and practice for future training in resource-limited settings. METHODS: The evaluation team conducted a mixed methods evaluation consisting of pre- and post-knowledge quizzes; quantification of engagement with the online platform; post-training surveys; qualitative interviews with training participants, non-participants, and key informants; and audits of six health facilities. RESULTS: A total of 364 participants from PNG signed up to participate in the CoHELP online training platform, with 41% (147/360) completing at least one module. Of the 24 participants who completed the post-training survey, 92% (22/24) would recommend the program to others and 79% (19/24) had used the knowledge or skills gained through CoHELP in their clinical practice. Qualitative interviews found that a lack of time and infrastructural challenges were common barriers to accessing online training, and participants appreciated the flexibility of online, self-paced learning. CONCLUSIONS: Initially high registration numbers did not translate to ongoing engagement with the CoHELP online platform, particularly for completion of evaluation activities. Overall, the CoHELP program received positive feedback from participants involved in the evaluation, highlighting the potential for further online training courses in PNG.

Role of Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Location on Abdominal Lymph Node Metastasis Risk.

BACKGROUND: Different sites of esophageal cancer are accompanied by different regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) risks. We aimed to investigate the impact of a lower tumor margin on abdominal LNM risk. METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) from 2014 to 2017 in West China Hospital. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed. We measured the distance between the lower tumor margin and esophagogastric junction (LED) with upper gastrointestinal contrast-enhanced X-ray (UGCXR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to explore the relationship between LED and the risk of abdominal LNM. Abdominal LNM risk in ESCC was stratified based on the location of the lower tumor margin. A model predicting abdominal LNM risk was constructed and presented with a nomogram. RESULTS: The included patients had an abdominal LNM rate of 48.29%. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LED was identified as a risk factor for abdominal LNM. Subgroup analysis of middle ESCC showed that patients with an LED less than 10 cm had a significantly higher rate of abdominal LNM than those with an LED greater than 10 cm. The abdominal LNM rate in middle ESCC patients with an LED less than 10 cm was 32.2%, while it was 35.1% in lower ESCC patients whose lower tumor margin did not invade the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), which was comparable after PSM. CONCLUSIONS: LED could help surgeons evaluate the risk of abdominal LNM preoperatively and better guide dissection of abdominal lymph nodes according to risk level.

Robot-assisted thymectomy in large anterior mediastinal tumors: A comparative study with video-assisted thymectomy and open surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted thymectomy (RAT) in large anterior mediastinal tumors (AMTs) (size ≥6 cm) compared with video-assisted thymectomy (VAT) and open surgery. METHODS: A total of 132 patients with large AMTs who underwent surgical resection from January 2016 to June 2022 were included in this study. A total of 61 patients underwent RAT, 36 patients underwent VAT and 35 patients underwent open surgery. Perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tumor size (p = 0.141), or pathological types (p = 0.903). Compared with the open group, the RAT and VAT groups were associated with a shorter operation time (115.00 vs. 160.00, p = 0.012; 122.50 vs. 160.00, p = 0.071), and less blood loss (50.00 vs. 200.00, p < 0.001; 50.00 vs. 200.00, p < 0.001), respectively. The rate of conversion in the RAT group was similar to that in the VAT group (6.56% vs. 13.89%, p = 0.229). Concomitant resection was less frequently performed in the VAT group than in the RAT and open groups (5.56% vs. 31.15%, p = 0.040; 5.56% vs. 31.43%, p = 0.006). VAT patients had a lower drainage volume (365.00 vs. 700.00 and 910.00 mL, p < 0.001), shorter duration of chest tube (2.00 vs. 3.00 and 4.00, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (5.00 vs. 6.00 and 7.00, p < 0.001) than the RAT and open groups. There was no 30-day mortality in any group. No difference was seen in R0 resection rates (p = 0.846). The postoperative complication rates were similar among the three groups (p = 0.309). Total in-hospital costs (66493.90 vs. 33581.05 and 42876.40, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the RAT group. CONCLUSIONS: RAT is safe and effective for the resection of large AMTs compared to VAT and open surgery. Vascular resection in RAT is technically feasible. A long-term follow-up is required.

Whether the start time of elective lung surgery impacts perioperative outcomes and cost?

Background: Fatigue and the long work hours of surgeons have attracted increasing concern in recent years. We aimed to explore whether starting time was associated with perioperative outcomes and cost for elective lung surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on elective lung surgery patients at a high surgery-volume center between September 2019 and November 2019. Patients were divided into the "early start group" if the surgery start time was before 4 post meridiem (pm), while the "late start group" was defined as surgery started after 4 pm. Perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were compared between the two groups. In addition, multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify whether start time was a risk factor for postoperative hospital duration, total hospital cost and length of operation time. Results: A total of 398 patients were finally enrolled for analysis in this study. Of all the cases, 295 patients were divided into the early start group, while 103 patients belonged to the late start group. Baseline characteristics were all comparable between the two groups. Concerning Regarding outcomes, there were no differences in postoperative hospital duration, operation time, complication incidence or and other outcomes, while the total hospital cost tended to be different but still not significantly different without statistical significance (P = 0.07). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, surgery starting late was still not found to be a risk factor for long postoperative hospital duration, high hospital cost and long surgery time. Conclusion: In elective lung surgery, perioperative outcomes and costs were similar between the early- and late-start groups, and it was not necessary to worry about the surgery order for these patients.

Surgical Treatment for Esophageal Leiomyoma: 13 Years of Experience in a High-Volume Tertiary Hospital.

Background: Esophageal leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor in the esophagus. Thoracotomy and thoracoscopy are both elective for esophageal leiomyoma enucleation. This study aimed at presenting surgical experience in our center and exploring more suitable surgical methods for different situations. Methods: We conducted this retrospective study by collecting data from patients who underwent esophageal leiomyoma enucleation through thoracotomy or thoracoscopy from January 2009 to November 2021 at West China Hospital Sichuan University. Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled for analysis. All patients were diagnosed with a single esophageal leiomyoma. There were 25 men and 9 women. The mean age was 44.41 years (range, 18-72 years), the mean longest diameter was 4.99 cm (range, 1.4-10 cm), and the esophagus was thoroughly circled with leiomyoma in 10 patients, 10 patients underwent thoracotomy to enucleate leiomyoma, while others underwent thoracoscopic enucleation. No perioperative deaths occurred. Between the thoracotomy group and thoracoscopy group, baseline characteristics were comparable except for gastric tube status (p = 0.034). Patients were inclined to undergo the left lateral surgery approach (p = 0.001) and suffered esophagus completely encircled by leiomyoma (p = 0.002). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the left lateral surgery approach (p = 0.014) and esophagus completely encircled by leiomyoma (p = 0.042) were risk factors for thoracotomy of leiomyoma enucleation, while a larger tumor size demonstrated no risk. The median follow-up time was 63.5 months, and no deaths or recurrence occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Thoracotomy enucleation of the leiomyoma was recommended when the esophagus was thoroughly encircled by the leiomyoma and the left lateral surgery approach was needed. However, tumor size demonstrated less value for selecting a surgical approach.

A New Risk Factor for Cervical Anastomotic Leakage-Role of The Relative Gastric Length in the Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Blood supply is especially weak near the gastric fundus. Making the anastomosis in this area would increase the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL). In cervical anastomosis, the gastric conduit needs to travel through the thorax. Therefore, the relative length between the stomach and the thorax is an essential factor in deciding if the poorly supplied area could be removed. This study was to explore if a small relative gastric length was a risk of cervical AL. If all other conditions are equal, could intrathoracic anastomosis be a better choice? METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagectomy with a preoperative barium swallow in West China Hospital between 2014 and 2017 were included. The length of the greater curvature and the thorax were obtained from the barium esophagogram. The ratio between the length of the greater curvature and the thorax was the relative gastric length calculated from the greater curvature (RGL-G). RESULTS: A total of 782 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. The cervical AL group had a significantly higher ratio of patients with an RGL-G less than 1.3 (26.7% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.003). The multivariate logistic regression proved that RGL-G less than 1.3 was a risk factor for cervical anastomotic leakage (p = 0.012). Correspondingly, RGL-G less than 1.3 was not a risk factor (6.3% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.289) in the intrathoracic anastomosis group. CONCLUSIONS: RGL-G less than 1.3 was a new risk factor for cervical AL, but it would not be a problem for intrathoracic anastomosis.

Case Report: Not a Mediastinal Mass! a Ruptured Giant Coronary Aneurysm That Occurred in a Young Man.

Introduction: Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is a localized coronary artery dilatation that exceeds 1. 5 times the diameter of a standard adjacent segment or the largest coronary vessel. When the expansion is > 2 cm, it is called a "giant" coronary artery aneurysm. Giant coronary artery aneurysm rupture is extremely rare and fatal. Case presentation: We present a rare case of a 27 years old male with a giant coronary artery aneurysm rupture, but no catastrophic events occurred immediately. He was initially misdiagnosed as having a mediastinal mass with CT (computed tomography). The cardiac ultrasound showed no pericardial effusion. But The cardiac CTA (computed tomography angiography) showed a giant coronary aneurysm rupture with hematoma formation. He eventually underwent surgery and was followed up for 2 months without complications. Conclusion: We report this case of a ruptured giant coronary aneurysm because of its infrequent occurrence in coronary artery disease. It is tough to distinguish this disease from a mediastinal tumor, and chest MRI and cardiac CTA are crucial tests. Finally, surgical resection may be the right choice for coronary aneurysm rupture. More cases need to be reported to facilitate the preoperative diagnosis of this rare coronary aneurysm.

Prognostic value of node skip metastasis on esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The association between NSM and prognosis of esophageal cancer remains controversial, though several studies have been conducted drawing their own conclusion. Therefore, we firstly carried out this meta-analysis aiming to explore the association. We performed a comprehensive literature search online, including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. We selected deaths at 5 years and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% (CI) to perform the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5.3, predicting value of clinic-pathological features in NSM also been analyzed. A total of 7 studies were finally enrolled in this study. NSM, defined by either JSED criterion or anatomical compartment criterion, neither showed significant prognostic value on OS of esophageal cancer (P = 0.64), (P = 0.24). Subgroup analysis of JSED criterion, NSM was not a prognostic factor in solitary node metastasis patients (P = 0.39), whereas NSM demonstrated a poor prognostic factor (P = 0.01) for ESCC. Subgroup analysis according to anatomical criterion, NSM was a favorable factor for OS in middle thoracic ESCC (P = 0.003). Pathological N1 status was found to be a risk factor for NSM (P < 0.00001) according to JSED criterion and middle thoracic ESCC was identified as a predictor for NSM (P = 0.0003) according to anatomical compartment criterion. According to JSED criterion, NSM demonstrated poor prognosis on ESCC and N1 status was a risk factor for NSM. Concerning the anatomical compartment criterion, a favorable prognosis of NSM was found in middle thoracic ESCC and NSM was prone to occur in middle thoracic ESCC. CRD42021219333.

Pretreatment-assisted robot intrathoracic layered anastomosis: our exploration in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIIVE) with intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis (EGA) is still under exploration and the preferred technique for intrathoracic anastomosis has not been established. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 43 consecutive patients who underwent MIIVE using the series technique called pretreatment-assisted robot intrathoracic layered anastomosis (PRILA), performed by a single surgeon between September 2018 and December 2020. The operative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean total operation time had been reduced from 446.38±54.775 minutes (range, 354-552) in the first year to 347.70±60.420 minutes (range, 249-450) later. There were no conversions to thoracotomy. All the patients achieved R0 resection. No patient suffered from anastomotic leakage. There was no 30-day mortality. The median length of postoperative stay was 10.0 days. CONCLUSIONS: PRILA further visualizes and streamlines the process of minimal invasive intrathoracic EGA, thus ensuring the precise anastomosis. It could be considered as a feasible alternative for intrathoracic EGA in MIILE.

Safety profile of preoperative administration of low-molecular-weight heparin on minimally invasive lung cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism remains a common but preventable complication for cancerous lung surgical patients. Current guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for lung patients at high risk of thrombosis, while a consensus about specific administration time is not reached. This study was designed to investigate the safety profile of preoperative administration of low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) for lung cancer patients. METHODS: From July 2017 to June 2018, patients prepared to undergo lung cancer surgery were randomly divided into the preoperative LMWH-administration group (PRL) for 4000 IU per day and the postoperative LMWH-administration group (POL) with same dosage, all the patients received thromboprophylaxis until discharge. Baseline characteristics including demographics and preoperative coagulation parameters were analyzed, while the endpoints included postoperative coagulation parameters, postoperative drainage data, hematologic data, intraoperative bleeding volume and reoperation rate. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were collected in this RCT, 34 patients were excluded according to exclusion criterion, 101 patients were assigned to PRL group and 111 patients belonged to POL group for analysis finally. The baseline characteristic and preoperative coagulation parameters were all comparable except the PRL group cost more operation time (p = 0.008) and preoperative administration duration was significantly longer (p < 0.001). The endpoints including postoperative day 1 coagulation parameters, mean and total drainage volume, drainage duration, intraoperative bleeding volume and reoperation rate were all similar between the two groups. Moreover, coagulation parameters for postoperative day 3 between the two groups demonstrated no difference. CONCLUSION: Preoperative administration of low-molecular-weight-heparin demonstrated safety and feasibility for lung cancer patients intended to receive minimally invasive surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000040547 ( www.chictr.org.cn ), 2020/12/1, retrospectively registered.

From McKeown to Ivor Lewis, the learning curve for thoracic lymphadenectomy over the first 100 robotic esophagectomy cases: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenectomy is an essential but challenging part of the surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, the previously reported learning curve for robotic esophagectomy primarily focused on only one surgical approach (McKeown or Ivor Lewis). However, both approaches must be mastered by a mature robotic surgical team to deal with different clinical conditions and satisfy patients' needs. This study aimed to show how an experienced esophageal surgical team became proficient in both McKeown and Ivor Lewis robotic esophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of the first 100 cases of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) by a single surgical team was performed. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to distinguish the change point during the learning course. A subgroup analysis was performed according to a surgical approach (McKeown or Ivor Lewis) to determine the effect of experience from one surgical approach on learning the other RAMIE technique. RESULTS: According to the tendency of the CUSUM plot, the learning curve was divided into four phases. The subgroup analysis indicated the decline of the CUSUM plot in the 3rd phase originated from the start of the Ivor Lewis approach. The attending surgeon took 23 cases to achieve a significant improvement in the number of harvested thoracic lymph nodes using the McKeown approach. Regardless of the acquired experience of McKeown RAMIE, it took another 18 cases for the surgical team to achieve significant improvement in harvesting thoracic lymph nodes using the Ivor Lewis approach. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-three cases were needed for an experienced surgical team to improve thoracic lymphadenectomy results using McKeown RAMIE. There was another learning phase during the transition from McKeown to Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Importantly, the acquired experience from performing McKeown RAMIE could shorten how long it takes to learn Ivor Lewis RAMIE.

Is the routine placement of a feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy worthwhile?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition dramatically increases the risk of postoperative complications and delays patient recovery. Therefore, a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) is routinely placed during esophagectomy to maintain the postoperative nutrition supply. However, recently published studies have questioned the need of a FJT in every esophageal cancer patient. Because most patients can resume oral intake shortly after surgery, the nutrition-providing function of a FJT becomes much less critical. In contrast, FJT-related complications could be severe. METHODS: Relevant publications were found out by systemic searching of four medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials). By reading the titles and the abstracts, potentially relevant studies were screened from the search results. The incidence of postoperative complications and FJT-related complications were calculated and compared to evaluate the efficacy of a FJT. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The no-FJT group had a similar or even lower incidence of postoperative complications [anastomotic leakage (AL), pulmonary complications, and wound infections] compared with the FJT group. Ileus and FJT site infections were the most common FJT-related complications. The incidence of ileus was approximately 6% (95% CI: 3-12%), and over 63% of the patients with an ileus required re-operation to relieve the obstruction. The pooled mean rate of FJT site infections was 7% (95% CI: 6-9%). Approximately 7% of patients had dysfunction (obstruction or dislocation) of the jejunostomy tube (95% CI: 3-14%). CONCLUSIONS: The non-selective placement of a FJT during esophagectomy provides few benefits to the patients and may even increase the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, an intraoperative FJT should be selectively prescribed, but not routinely in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Is immunonutrition superior to standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Perioperative enteral nutrition supports are recommended in esophagus cancer patients. Immunonutrition contains immuno-enhancing nutrients in addition to standard formula. These new nutrients are thought to be efficacious in reducing inflammatory response and improving postoperative immune response and they have been proved to be better than standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in gastric cancer. However, if it would lead to a better clinical outcome in patients undergoing esophagectomy remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in the online database of PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The relevant studies were screened out of the results by reading titles and abstracts. Then, we read the full-texts to finally confirm the studies included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials having enrolled 638 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis didn't show statistically significant difference between immunonutrition group and standard nutrition group in reducing postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative complications are comparable between immunonutrition and the standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing esophagectomy, but its value in severe malnutrition patients is undetermined, whereas the high tolerance and other advantages brought by the immunonutrition should not be overlooked and need to be further proved.

Role of nodal skip metastasis in patients with mid-thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching study.

OBJECTIVES: Nodal skip metastasis (NSM) is a common phenomenon in mid-thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (MT-OSCC); however, the prognostic implications of NSM in patients with MT-OSCC remain unclear. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 300 patients with MT-OSCC who underwent radical oesophagectomy and who had pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis from January 2014 to December 2016. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of NSM. Propensity score matching was applied to minimize patient selection bias. The impact of NSM on overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and multiple Cox proportional hazards analyses. The median follow-up time was 57 months. RESULTS: The NSM rate in the entire cohort was 22.0% (66/300). Pathological N (pN) stage (P < 0.001) and sex (P = 0.001) were identified as significant independent risk factors for NSM. NSM was more frequent in pN1 compared with pN2 patients (87.9% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001) and no NSM was found in pN3. NSM(+) patients had better prognoses than NSM(-) patients (Kaplan-Meier; 3-year OS, 62.1% vs 34.1%, P < 0.001). Propensity score matching produced 51 matched pairs, and the 3-year OS was still better in the NSM(+) compared with the NSM(-) group (66.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.025). Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed NSM(+) as an independent factor favouring OS in patients with MT-OSCC. CONCLUSIONS: NSM usually occurs at pN1 stage in patients with MT-OSCC, and is associated with a favourable prognosis.

Predictors for the clinical benefit of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The overall objective response rate (ORR) of published clinical trials in advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients who received anti-program-death-1 (anti-PD-1) or program-death-legend-1 (anti-PD-L1) therapy was only 10%. This ratio is far away from satisfying. It is necessary to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from the treatment. This study aimed to identify the factors with which the patients would have a higher response rate to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. METHODS: The study was carried out according to the Cochrane handbook for systemic reviews of intervention. The comparisons were conducted according to the patients' characteristics to distinguish the factors with which the patients would have a higher response rate and better survival from the therapy. RESULTS: One thousand and nine hundred ninety-eight patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer receiving anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L-1 therapy were enrolled totally. Both the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L-1 therapy were significantly more efficacy in patients with high expression of PD-L1. Adenocarcinoma patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. Patients with a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status had a significantly higher ORR and disease control rate (DCR). The treatment also had a better performance in improving the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with high expression of PD-L1. CONCLUSIONS: The expression level of PD-L1, MSI, and ECOG performance status could be the predictors of achieving clinical benefit from anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

Fixed in the neck or pushed back into the thorax?-Impact of cervical anastomosis position on anastomosis healing.

BACKGROUND: Cervical anastomotic leakage remains a great challenge for thoracic surgeons in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the factors affecting cervical anastomosis healing, the surgical technique is the key controllable element. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy, especially those controllable surgical factors. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy in the past eight years in West China Hospital was performed. Patients with cervical anastomotic leakage were assigned to leakage group (LG) while the left was enrolled in the none-leakage group (NLG). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: A total of 518 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In the baseline comparison, the difference in fixation of anastomosis in the neck, anastomosis mode, diabetes, and hypertension between the LG and NLG reached statistically significant. Moreover, the statistical difference of cervical fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension remained significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The cervical anastomosis fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension are independent risk factors of gastroesophageal cervical anastomotic leakage.